11-19-19

 

ABOUT THE GREAT CONSPIRACY - Part 10

3/27/91 HATONN

WORDS AND IMAGES

To purvey its propaganda, the ADL has machined a special set of verbal tools for its unique purposes, just as did the communists, for whom "democracy" means communism and "liquidate" means murder.  The ADL vocabulary is designed to make the ADL and its clients look wonderful while making its victims and enemies seem abhorrent.  The process begins with the creation of two contrasting images--one of innocence, kindliness, intelligence, and tolerance, and another of absolute evil.  The latter image is represented as an amalgam of disease, neurosis, insanity, wild-eyed religious fanaticism, mindless hatred, torture, and mass murder, most typically in the form of pogroms, medieval and modern.

You have all seen the movies, the novels, the comics, the plays, the "musicals", the comedians, the well-tutored teachers, and the endless torrent of television programs which create those ADL-desired images.

LOVE AND HATE

The lines are drawn as clearly as at any Saturday-night professional wrestling match, where the handsome, clean-cut athlete in the white cowboy hat confronts the grotesque, slavering mount of blubber that will attempt to annihilate him.  The crowds go wild with love and hate of the images even before the battle of good and evil begins, and once it is established who deserves to be obliterated, the same brutal cheating that draws boos when originated by the monster brings screams of delight when used by the good guy.

The ADL places itself and those it represents in the angelic realm of Good.  Those who oppose it or displease it are consigned to the demonic kingdom of Evil.  The military invasions of the Good are righteous wars of self-defense.  Everybody else's wars are wars of aggression.  The tortures and prison-murders of the Good are interrogations and accidents.  The napalming of civilians and endless blasting of everything in sight along with the wiping out of entire villages are "retaliations" and justified at the least and "inspiring military victories" at best if carried out by the "Good", and deed of infamy to be memorialized ad nauseam if inflicted by the "Evil", i.e., profits from Iraqi oil is unforgivable and worthy of destruction of all of Iraq--while the Sabahs of Kuwait glean 100% of the oil profits and every other product of Kuwait and it is somehow worthy of wiping out an entire nation to replace the "Good and Displaced Master to his Monarch's Throne"--with gold faucets in place.  The masses seem to see nothing of the imbalance even as uncovered for the horror it is.

When the ADL spreads lies about somebody it is "sharing information about the true nature of its victim.  If the lies are about an employee, the employee is cautioned about " the effect on the community goodwill" of your keeping such an individual on your payroll after you have been made aware of his "true nature".  A politician or businessman who is threatened with blackmail if he doesn't fall in line is being "sensitized to Jewish concerns".

The expression of views disliked by the ADL is a "spewing forth of bigotry and hate".  Such views are "filth", "garbage", "obscene", a "threat to American democracy", and constitute "pollution of the airwaves".  Such views "are not legitimate fare", and "have no place on the log of a reputable broadcaster".  Certain opinions (i.e., those opposed by the ADL) are not within the constitutional protection of freedom of speech.

ANTI-SEMITISM CHAMELEONS

The most favored and most devastating terms of the ADL's arsenal are "anti-Semitism" and its variants.  There is, of course, nothing worse than anti-Semitism.  It is the greatest evil in the history of the world, and it always "lurks just below the surface of Western civilization ready to burst forth in a new orgy of horror".  Just why it should lurk there--or even what it is--is rarely discussed, but all good folk must be "ever watchful for its slightest manifestation", and put before all else their efforts to stuff it back under the topsoil when it tries to break out.  It is a "deadly virus" which must, along with its carriers, be dealt with like an uncontrolled outbreak of deadly typhoid.

Likewise vague, and purposely so, is what constitutes anti-Semitism.  It is a wide net that catches many fish.  Even a Jew who says the wrong thing (especially a Judean)--such as Saul Joftes, for many years an officer of the B'nai B'rith--is called an anti-Semite.  He is also a "sick individual" who has deteriorated as a result of "severe emotional problems".

In order to make criticism of Zionism ineradicably disreputable, the ADL says that anybody other than a Zionist who uses the word "Zionist" is really using a code-word for Jew.  Therefore, any criticism of Zionism (including Israel, of course) is irrational and obscene and demonic, not to mention anti-Semitic.  Furthermore, any criticism of Israel or the ADL is invariably reported by the ADL as "an attack on Israel (or the ADL) and on all Jews", even though there has been no reference directly or indirectly to Jews.

No discussion of ADL vocabulary would be complete without mention of that word for all seasons--"canard".  A canard is a false or unfounded story, and any allegation or report which the ADL does not like is simply dubbed a "canard" and thus disposed of for all time without the need for analysis or discussion.

It can be seen that to the ADL, language is not so much a means of communication as a means of obfuscation, and that words are used to mislead, to put the truth out of focus, and to avoid confronting real issues.

ATTEMPTS STIFLING FREEDOM OF SPEECH (FOR ALL OTHERS)

From the earliest years of its history, the ADL has revealed itself to be a self-anointed censor of what should reach the public consciousness in America.  One of its main fields of activity is the suppression of views it does not want heard and, as such, it is the avowed enemy of freedom of speech.

The favored method, where it is feasible, is called "quarantine".  It simply means that a person or group subject to quarantine is never heard of and never heard from.  What he says and does is not reported (except to the ADL) and what he writes is not published.  If he is engaged to speak by a club or college or broadcasting station, the ADL sees to it that the speech never takes place.  The sponsoring entity is subjected to telephone calls, threatening letters, and visits by delegations of local ADL and B'nai B'rith supporters.  Our colleagues are quite familiar with all these forms of terror.

If quarantine works, then its victim is rendered, for all practical purposes, voiceless and unable to exert influence except in the most restricted sphere.  He is not even attacked.  He is a non-person and this is what they attempt to accomplish with us and our group, and since they have not accomplished that which they intend, we can know that the attacks will worsen.  This is WHY Truth must be placed in the hands of you-the-people for there will be giving forth of "truth" through the regular media channels--NONE!  You, therefore, feel overwhelmed and out-numbered.  No, there are only some 3% of the population of "them", but growing like weed seeds in the tilled soil, or they control that which reaches out and into the masses of the populations of the nation and the world.

The concept of quarantine is quite openly discussed in ADL circles as an alternative to active slandering of its enemies.  The Washington "Star" of February 10, 1965 reported that Herman Edelsberg, director of the ADL's Washington office, said that members of the "radical right" who could not be persuaded to change their views to conform with the ADL's dogmas should be dealt with by "keeping them in quarantine, until, from tedium, they drop out".  Are we going to allow this to happen in our instance?  And further, if Dharma is rendered helpless to continue to write, will the efforts simply die and be buried?  I have to keep her in all-but isolation to prevent total "quarantine" by the adversary.  These things have to be looked at and properly perceived as to intent.  What you readers did or did not do prior to the reading of this truthful information is one thing--to fail to respond in reason and action once being informed is quite another.  You have been "told and taught" that you are helpless and "can't fight city hall".  BS!  How else are you going to regain that which is your very birthright?  They are terrified of you in mass and you can know as much by the very code-words they utilize.  Can we not coin our own "cute code names and go for it"?  How about Phoenix Storm, or "Citizen Cloud-burst" or, or?  How about "Constitutional Steamroller" or simply 'ONE NATION UNDER TRUTH (which IS God)", or UNITY THROUGH THE CONSTITUTION", or even "BRICK WALL OF TRUTH".  REGAIN YOUR CONSTITUTION AND YOUR HEAVENLY BANNER AND YOU NEED NO CODE NAMES--NO HIDDEN LAMPS BENEATH THE BUSHEL.  RETURNING UNTO GOD, A NATION UNDER A JUST CONSTITUTION NEEDS NO FOOLISH CODE NAMES ONCE PURPOSE IS ATTAINED.  THE ENEMY HAS CHOSEN TO STRIKE THINE VULNERABLE PARTS--YOU WILL SHORE UP YOUR SHIELDS AND STAND STRONG AGAINST HIM FOR HE CAN ONLY "REFLECT" THAT WHICH HE DISCERNS AS WEAKNESS WITHIN YOU-THE-PEOPLE.  SURPRISE HIM AND HE WILL BE RENDERED HELPLESS.

NO DEBATE--AJC

An organization that has been closely linked to the ADL in purpose and in fund-raising, the American Jewish Committee, (AJC), concluded in January, 1960, after a five-year study (36 years ahead of you) by Dr. Andhil Fineberg, that an opponent's statements should not be debated because debate would strengthen the opponent's ability to get attention.  Those who knew him should "privately expose him to opinion molders".  Presumably one is exposed if he is called a hatemonger and an anti-Semite in the right private quarters.  It may be, however, that some genuine dirt can be dug up, in which case a wider audience is desirable: "...publicity can be effective where a bigot is concealing facts about himself".  (Quoted in Joseph P. Kamp, "The Bigots Behind the Swastika Spree", 1960.)

A member of the audience at a so-called "Rumor Clinic" presented by Hyman Haves of the ADL's southern California office on February 1, 1950 in Santa Ana, California, reported some of the speaker's remarks in this manner:

"Explaining the tactics of the League (ADL), Haves related instances wherein ADL representatives called on editors and radio station owners in cities where opponents were scheduled to speak.  He told how the editors and radio station operators were "enlightened and convinced" to give no publicity to this as the "quarantine or silent treatment" and said it was greatly reducing the audiences of the enemies of the league.

"He said boastfully that many ADL opponents "have been cut down" by finding some embarrassing or unpleasant happening in their past and using it against them.  Haves said the league found the income of one particular enemy who paid income tax on only $11,000, to be actually $32,000, and said the ADL simply gathered the information and turned it over to the federal government.

"You 'can call these tactics anything you want to', Haves commented.  'You can even say smear.  We prefer to say education.' "

Let me assure you here and now that it is a brave broadcaster who will allow George Green on the airwaves and this is why the subject in usually listed as something to do with UFO's and adventures thereof for "silence Green" documents have regularly been sent to all networks and all major talk and interview forums.  If the journalists ever see "light" and the power they actually have by banning together and "daring" to speak out, the whole thing can be unfolded overnight but even the "60 MINUTES" team and Andy Rooney capitulated to the attackers.  Doesn't it soak into the heads of the other networks that CNN got all the gravy, frosting, and income from this nice little staged massacre in Iraq?  Patriotism?  IT IS TREASON AGAINST AMERICA!

SILENT TREATMENT TECHNOLOGY

A striking instance of the silent treatment technology is found in a letter, dated December 13, 1933, written beneath the letterhead of the ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE, Chicago, Illinois, by Richard E. Gutstadt, director... the letter begins, "To the Publishers of Anglo-Jewish Periodicals",

"Gentlemen:

Scribner & Sons have just published a book by Madison Grant entitled The Conquest of a Continent.  It is extremely antagonistic to Jewish interests.  Emphasized throughout is the "Nordic superiority' theory, and the utter negation of any 'melting pot' philosophy with regard to America.

"We are interested in stifling the sale of this book.  We believe that this can be best accomplished by refusing to be stampeded into giving it publicity.  Every review of public criticism of a book of this character brings it to the attention of many who would otherwise know nothing of it.  This results in added sales.  The less discussion there is concerning it, the more sales resistance will be created.

"We therefore appeal to you to refrain from comment on this book, which will undoubtedly be brought to your attention sooner of later.  It is our conviction that a general compliance with this request will sound the warning to other publishing houses against engaging in this type of venture."

BRILLIANCE OR BLUNDER

How did such a book as BY WAY OF DECEPTION, dealing with the Mossad, ever become distributed?  At first it didn't for there was not a brave enough publisher--then it did find its way to print.  After being already into print, never underestimate possibilities. There was major consternation and then actual pushing of the book's distribution just long enough to allow presentation and not long enough to get many ongoing upset readers.  Further, the adversary utilized the "lemon" to make lemon-drops, lemon pie, cake, and ade.  They allowed the "Mossad" to be even bigger than life and in essence said, "..to Hell with you, we are so powerful, clever and infiltrated that there is nothing you had better do to interfere!" and they have continued to prove it to you on a daily basis.

AMERICAN CURTAIN OF HARDENED STEEL

In 1955 ADL National Chairman Henry Schultz wrote on ADL stationary to Lt. Gen. George E. Stratemeyer, complaining that the distinguished general had written a letter endorsing John O. Beaty's book, IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA, "and recommending it to Americans in general".  Schultz then went on to educate Gen. Stratemeyer about the book's author:

"Professor Beaty is no newcomer to the field of anti-Jewish propaganda.  As long ago as 1948 he was delivering anti-Semitic lectures in the Southwest."

Until the publication of IRON CURTAIN OVER AMERICA, Beaty was "irritating only in a local sense".  Now he was nationally known, and something had to be done about it.  (Exactly what Prof. Beaty had said that was so objectionable was not revealed, of course, and the ADL did not "propose to burden" the general "at this point with our detailed analysis of the book...").  Not unlike either William Cooper's attack against Dharma nor that of ASSK?

The ADL's muscle man then put on the twist in typical heavy handed, oblique fashion:

"...in view of the foregoing it is our feeling that you may want to consider the advisability of some public action which can assure the American people, who hold you in such high regard, that you repudiate religious hatred, as we know you do, and the use of your name by Professor Beaty..."

The renowned Air Force general responded, "I forcefully resent what you have said or implied", and stated, "I do not consider that book anti-Jewish in any sense of the word."  He continued:

"When the United States of America reaches the point where a citizen cannot read what he desires to read and to recommend such reading to others then we will have reached the status that exists in Soviet Russia...As I interpret your letter, your organization would have the people read only what you think should be read and recommended to others.  This I resent as a free American citizen.

"I do not understand what you mean by your statement 'we do not propose to burden you at this point, etc."  Is this a veiled threat to my free expression and thoughts?  If so, this I also resent.

"Your letter is the most outrageous communication I have ever received in my life and I intend to give it the widest possible publicity, including my many Jewish friends."

A somewhat similar incident occurred in 1959, when Gen. Ulysses S. Grant III caused an article called "Abraham Lincoln and the Rothschilds" to be distributed to members of the Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States.  Herman Edelsberg of the Washington D.C. office of the ADL wrote an insulting letter to Gen. Grant on June 19, 1959, claiming that he had lent his name "to a vile anti-Semitic canard" and "the fabrication of a warped mind".  (Not, again, greatly unlike the attack of Bob Girard against Dharma and the Journals...incredible ravings of an insane mind!")  Edelberg dwelt in an uncomplimentary manner upon the alleged history of the article and its distributors, of course, rather than upon to factual content of the piece, which had to do with the role of international bankers in the American Civil War.  Edelsberg ordered the general to "speedily and fully repudiate" the publication.  Gen. Grant replied indignantly with a defense of the historical accuracy of the article, and pointed out that it was only Edelsberg and the ADL who had given it "the anti-Jewish twist".

"What 'the international bankers' in Europe did a century ago to help the Confederacy cannot by any reasonable person be considered a reflection on many, many good Americans who are Jews, and your effort to make it seem so is difficult to understand."

The ADL pressure continued, with great play in the newspapers--which tended, as is usually the case with newspapers, to adopt the ADL's language as their own and to describe the article flatly as "anti-Semitic".  There was much debate over whether the general had "apologized", but the apology was also an ADL fantasy and the general never abandoned his guns.

As with the case of Gates in Los Angeles and the "brutality cases" sweeping publicity in the U.S., the acts of the police are only a tiny, tiny pin-point of what is REALLY going on here.  Look at reasonable facts (and forget for a minute, one D. Gates).  Gates is "Chief", HOWEVER, Gates only carries out the directions of the Council who sets the directives.  Therefore, the point cannot be actually over Gates nor the regulations and guidelines.  So what might it be?  It is an all-out attempt to get the proper persons controlled by the Elite into office and stir up such hatred and violence within and among the races that the nation is totally distracted while "they" disarm you.  Believe me, chelas, if this thing is not "checked" it will erupt into the biggest and most violently bloody race war ever upon your globe.  You gain nothing by locking the barn door after all the horses are scattered to the winds save to disallow re-entry into the barn for those who would not shape up their modus operandi.  You simply cannot comprehend the massive fog upon your lands.

LET US LOOK AT GARY ALLEN / NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY

Congressman John G. Schmitz of California received the same kind of treatment in the summer of 1972, after he had written an introduction and endorsement to NONE DARE CALL IT CONSPIRACY, by Gary Allen.  Mr. Allen, like the author of Gen. Grant's article, had spoken of "international bankers".  Harvey Scheehter of the ADL sent a letter to Congressman Schmitz.

"We were distressed to read your introduction to and endorsement of "None Dare Call it Conspiracy" by Gary Allen, and we hereby call upon you to withdraw your endorsement and repudiate this anti-Semitic propaganda book."

Do any of you readers see the incredible similarity in the attacks of ASSK refuting all association with the Phoenix material?  Sister was sent forth to STOP Dharma from ever writing on behalf of the Hosts and she failed, therefore she comes under attack with insistence that she discredit source of the thorns in the ointment.  Well, she can't do it!  They could have, had they honored their contract to publish the material as originally set forth, but they blew it through ego and now the demands are silly and foolish even unto the understanding.

And what of Dharma?  Brave?  No, she has had to learn to release it to US.  I do not mean to be flippant but it is too late, the "fat is in the fire" and the only hope of safety is to remain in our care and shielding for the enemy cannot stand against GOD!

Further, you who were bored with all the personal encounters and sharing within the public forum of the Express, may now understand that it is the only forum through which to silence the silencers.

Congressman Schmitz published the ADL letter along with his own reply in the "Congressional Record" of June 19, 1972.  He wrote to Schecter that Schecter's attack on him because of "None Dare Call it Conspiracy" was "one of the most remarkable confirmations of the book's thesis that I have seen", in that Gary Allen had stated that the ADL was used "as and instrument to try to convince everyone that any mention of the Rothschilds or their allies is an attack on all Jews.

Quoting from the book, Congressman Schmitz continued:

"Any individual or book exploring the subject is immediately attacked by hundreds of ADL committees all over the country.  The ADL has never let truth or logic interfere with its highly professional smear jobs.  When no evidence is apparent, the ADL, which staunchly opposed so-called 'McCarthyism', accuses people of being 'latent anti-Semites' ".

"There is not a word in Gary Allen's book which could possibly be construed by any reasonable man as an attack on any religious faith".

KNOW, chelas, that there are a lot of sleepless nights in Washington D.C. over the Phoenix material and "what to do about it". This should bring hope for all of you who feel like your efforts are worthless and yet it should also bring a renewed attempt at "caution" to you ones who handle this material.  You see, the difference in point herein IS THAT "THEY KNOW WHO I AM, WITH WHOM I COME, WHAT I AM HERE FOR AND ALL THOSE OTHER GOODLY THINGS.  "THEY" CANNOT SIMPLY UTILIZE THE ORDINARY PATHWAY TO RID THEMSELVES OF ONE, HATONN, NOR SANANDA, GERMAIN, MICHAEL, ATON, ETC.  WE SIT LIKE THE DEATH KNELL UPON THEIR HEADS.  THEY DARE NOT ACTUALLY KILL DHARMA OR MY CREW FOR THEY KNOW RESPONSE WILL BE INSTANT.  THEY LEARNED THAT BY HAVING "KILLED" HER AND WE SIMPLY RENEWED HER AND SENT HER BACK AND SO IT IS LIKE THE "BOY BEHIND THE BARN"--"O DOD, O DOD, WHAT I DO NOW?"  SO, YOU ARE GOING THROUGH THE "SILENT" PHASE, THE NAME CALLING AND DENOUNCING AS ANTI-SEMITIC, INSANE, AND BURDENED WITH SUCH HORRENDOUS LEGAL AND EMOTIONAL MATTERS AS TO BRING THEM DOWN.  WELL, BROTHERS, WITH GOD TO SUSTAIN THE FAITHFUL, THEY CANNOT BRING HER DOWN!!  AT ANY RATE, THEY HAVE NO WAY ON EARTH TO BRING ME DOWN.  THEREFORE, I CAN AFFORD TO BE A BIT MORE CHARITABLE AND PATIENT THAN THEY, AS CAN--OBVIOUSLY--YOU!  SMILE, FOR YOU ARE WINNING!

Among its other efforts on behalf of American democracy, the ADL attempted to get the Federal Communications Commission to prevent telephone companies from permitting the purveyors of certain ideas from using their recorded message services.  The group the ADL had specifically in mind had denounced the Peace Corps and (according to the ADL) called up "lurid visions of a 'communist conspiracy' lurking behind" various groups, including (surprise now!!) the ADL, (Washington "Post", Sept. 9, 1965.)  A few years later the Supreme Court eventually thwarted a prolonged ADL effort to make the FCC take away the license of a radio station which had broadcast an "appeal to prejudice".  The ADL had refused a preferred opportunity to broadcast a reply:

"A reply, said attorneys for the Jewish service organization, only focuses more attention upon a racial or religious slur, lending it more dignity."

THE SAME POLICY IS NO DOUBT USEFUL IF ONE JUST CAN'T THINK OF A GOOD ANSWER.

BANNING 900 NUMBERS

Now "why" and "who" do you suppose is behind first the availability of obscene material and sexually explicit 900 phone numbers? Then who do you think continues to advertise them through the controversy and the media?  Ah so, perhaps you will yet get your graduation diploma.  And next, who keeps it stirring until you-the-public shut down any service of such manner which serves for daily prayer, updates on the Constitution, etc.?  You-the-people walk gently and demandingly right into the traps and thumb your nose at your brothers while your neck in broken.  YOU put the bars on your own window--literally!  You allow the treasonists and criminals to go further in controlling you while you apply the prison bars to your own doors and windows--worse, you allow ones like the beaten Black man and the beaten children to be your cause to incarcerate your populace.  THOSE INCIDENTS ARE STRUCTURED TO ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING AND IT ISN'T TO SIMPLY BEAT UP ON A BLACK MAN BECAUSE IT IS A WEEK-NIGHT--THE INTENT IS SO DEEP AND SO HIGH THAT THE "MOUNTAIN" STOPS YOU FROM SEEING THE FACTS WHICH LAY OPEN BEFORE YOU.

What is the worst thing in writing for Hatonn?  The having to see and know!, Dharma screams out in protest, "...no, I do not want to know."  I have pain right along with her and all of you...but it must be so; the medicine must be taken if the cure is to be achieved.  IS IT TRULY EASIER, IN THE LONG RUN, TO HIDE BEHIND THE YELLOW RIBBONS OR THE YELLOW-FLOWERS OF A FUNERAL BOUQUET?  IS IT TRULY EASIER TO DRAPE THE SCREENS OF VISION IN YELLOW SHROUDS DIPPED IN THE LIFE-BLOOD OF AN ENTIRE PLANET AND A DYING SPECIES OF CREATOR'S GREATEST PERFECTION OF CREATION? WHO DO YOU REALLY FOOL, AMERICA?  TO SET THIS THING TO RIGHT, IT REQUIRES THOSE OF ALL NATIONS TO STAND TALL AND CAST ASIDE THE SILLY DISGUISES GIVEN YOU TO HIDE BEHIND.  IT REQUIRES THAT YOU STAND FOR THAT WHICH THAT FLAG STANDS FOR!  WAVING IT AND SCREAMING FOR WAR ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE FOR THE FLAG CAN ONLY STAND AS TALL AS THE HOLDER WITHIN WHICH IT IS PLACED.  IF THE HOLDER IS CRUSHED, THE BANNER WILL FALL AND BE TRAMPLED.  YOUR FLAG-HOLDER IS SMASHED INTO DUST.

Let us please have a break for we have been at this since daylight without break and it is now midday.  I am sorry for the lost documents but it is only a perturbation of no consequence for that which they remove, we shall simply replace.  Annoying and frustrating but of no consequence for God does not become unbalanced.  Salu.

Hatonn to stand-by please.  Dharma, please chela, we need to write again this day for we have much to cover beyond this subject material.  I will allow you time off to do thine other tasks on the morrow, if pressures are a bit lessened.  If we write more this day it allows more freedom on the morrow.  Thank you.

***

Source:  PHOENIX JOURNAL EXPRESS, March 1991, Volume 10, Number 11 & 12 Pages 1-7.

http://phoenixarchives.com/express/1991/0391/10-11-12.pdf

 

 

---