July 17, 2015

11/15/91 #1   HATONN

Of the other variety of memoirs, those which present a picture of frail Jewry caught in the vice of Nazism, the most celebrated is undoubtedly THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK, and the truth concerning this book is only one appalling insight into the fabrication of the propaganda legend.  It has already been proven over and over again as a hoax, but the media and Zionists continue to deny the facts and continue to silence the truth-bringers.  I only give that which has been presented to you over and over again.  Why don't YOU know about these things?  Because the contradiction is NEVER ALLOWED ON THE MEDIA OR IN THE PRESS IN ANY WAY WHICH GAINS ATTENTION.  BOOKS CONTAINING THE TRUTH ARE BANISHED AND A SPECIAL FOOTBALL GAME WILL BE AIRED IN THE SLOT WHEREIN SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE GIVEN YOU SOME TRUTH.

First published in 1952, THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK became an immediate best-seller; since then it has been republished in paperback, going through 40 impressions, and was made into a successful Hollywood film.  In royalties alone, Otto Frank, the girl's father, has made a fortune from the sale of the book, which purports to represent the real-life tragedy of his daughter.  With its direct appeal to the emotions, the book and the film have influenced literally millions of people, certainly more throughout the world than any other story of its kind.  And yet only seven years after its initial publication A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT CASE ESTABLISHED THAT THE BOOK WAS A HOAX.

It is the way in which the book is presented that is the problem.  If it had been presented as a novel of "fiction" and drama, excellent, for it is sensitive and emotionally captivating.  But this is NOT that which happened.  THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK has been sold to the public as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl from Amsterdam, which she wrote at the age of 12 while her family and four other Jews were hiding in the back room of a house during the German occupation.  Eventually, they were arrested and detained in a concentration camp, where Anne Frank supposedly died when she was 14.  When Otto Frank was liberated from the camp at the end of the war, he returned to the Amsterdam house and "found" his daughter's diary concealed in the rafters.

The truth about the Anne Frank Diary was first revealed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Fria Ord.  It established that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had written the dialogue of the "diary" and was demanding payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank.  A condensation of the Swedish articles appeared in the American Economic Council Letter, April 15, 1959, as follows:

"History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth, and may become more effective than truth.

"The Western World has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story, Anne Frank's Diary.  Any informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager."

[H: This is NOT the reasoning which is valid, however, for one does not "judge" on such opinion but on merit of facts presented.]

"A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin's work on the Anne Frank Diary.

"Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, promised to pay to his race kin, Meyer Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the dialogue of Author Levin just as it was and 'implanted' it in the diary as being his daughter's intellectual work."

Further inquiries brought a reply on May 7th, 1962 from a firm of New York lawyers, which stated:

"I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank, and others.  It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter.  That award was later set aside by trial justice, Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law.  The action was subsequently settled while an appeal from Judge Coleman's decision was pending.

"I am afraid that the case itself is not officially reported, so far as the trial itself, or even Judge Coleman's decision, is concerned.  Certain procedural matters were reported in 141 New York Supplement, Second Series 170, and in 5 Second Series 181.  The correct file number in the New York County Clerk's office is 2241-1956 and the file is probably a large and full one..."

 

Here, then, is just one more fraud in a whole series of frauds perpetrated in support of the "Holocaust" legend and the saga of the Six Million.  Of course, the court case bearing directly on the authenticity of the Anne Frank Diary was "not officially reported".

A brief reference may also be made to another "diary", published not long after that of Anne Frank and entitled: NOTES FROM THE WARSAW GHETTO: THE JOURNAL OF EMMANUEL RINGELBLUM (New York, 1958).  Ringelblum had been a leader in the campaign of sabotage against the Germans in Poland, as well as the revolt of the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943, before he was eventually arrested and executed in 1944.

It is a MUST to constantly remind yourselves of the facts herein regarding the REASON the "Jews" were in that Ghetto: The "Jews" had also declared to be in a State of War against Germany.  America had already put all American Japanese citizens and any Japanese in the States into concentration (detention) camps.  This was the same event in Germany only with Jews--who had declared war against Germany and were, in fact, having constant war encounters.

 The gathering up of Jews didn't "just happen"--the Jews declared a state of war.

The Ringelblum journal, which speaks of the usual "rumors" allegedly circulating about the extermination of the Jews in Poland, appeared under exactly the same Communist auspices as the so-called Hoess memoirs.  McGraw-Hill, the publishers of the American edition, admit that they were denied access to the uncensored original manuscript in Warsaw, and instead faithfully followed the expurgated volume published by the Communist Government in Warsaw in 1952.  All the "proofs" of the Holocaust issuing from Communist sources of this kind are worthless as historical documents.

Since the war, there has been an abundant growth of sensational concentration camp literature, the majority of it Jewish; each book piling horror upon horror, blending fragments of truth with the most grotesque of fantasies and impostures, relentlessly creating an edifice of mythology in which any relations to historical fact has long since disappeared.  We have referred to the type already--Olga Lengyel's absurd FIVE CHIMNEYS ("24,000 corpses handled every day").  The truth is terrible enough and to lie causes all respect to leave for that horror which was actually present.

You have to realize, dear ones, that this is part and parcel of the "plan" to deceive and thereby move into one world control over you-the-masses.  It is directly accomplished through the traditions such as the "Kol Nidre" whereby, annually, on Day of Atonement--the vows are rendered negated until the following Day of Atonement.  The Protocols "order" that the Talmudists (Zionists) lie, cheat, steal and do anything necessary to accomplish the ends of World Domination.

Another couple of books which represent the same type of issue are DOCTOR AT AUSCHWITZ by Miklos Nyiszli, apparently a mythical and invented person, THIS WAS AUSCHWITZ: THE STORY OF A MURDER CAMP by Phillip Friedman, and so on ad nauseam.

Another in this same vein is FOR THOSE I LOVED by Martin Gray (Bodley Head, 1973), which purports to be an account of his experiences at Treblinka camp in Poland.  Gray specialized in selling fake antiques to America before turning to concentration camp memoirs.  The circumstances surrounding the publication of his book, however, have been unique, because for the first time with works of this kind, serious doubt was cast on the authenticity of its contents.  Even Jews, alarmed at the damage it might cause, denounced his book as fraudulent and questioned whether he had ever been at Treblinka at all, while B.B.C. radio pressed him as to why he had waited 28 years before writing of his experiences.

You all must realize that it is only the few who know the truth of these lies.  Ones who came out of the concentration camps to find family members still living, never thought further than the ones who came out and found all missing.  There was no way to KNOW what transpired in another place; even the next room.  Circumstances were terrible at best and the stories would be accepted without question, just as YOU do--that your Government is Pure and Works in your Behalf!  Your senses tell you otherwise but it is easier and more comforting to believe the "orthodox" ideas.  As these one who escaped are shown pictures supposedly of Auschwitz, how can they know the pictures came from the Eisenhower prison camp of death?  As you come into discernment, this is WHY you must attend facts as given and THEN, ONLY THEN, decide how it might have been other than given.

It was interesting to observe that the "Personal Opinion" column of the London Jewish Chronicle, March 29, 1973, although it roundly condemned Gray's book, nevertheless made grandiose additions to the myth of the Six Million.  It stated that: "Nearly a million people were murdered in Trablinka in the course of a year, 18,000 were fed into the gas chambers every day."  It is a pity indeed that so many people read and accept this kind of nonsense without so much as exercising their minds.  If 18,000 were murdered every day, the figure in a mere 56 days, not "in the course of a year".  This gigantic achievement would leave the remaining ten months of the year a total blank. 18,000 every day would in fact mean a total of 6,480,000 "in the course of a year".  Does this mean that the Six Million died in twelve months at Treblinka?  What about the alleged three or four million at Auschwitz?  This kind of thing simply shows that, once the preposterous compromise figure of Six Million had scored a resounding success and became internationally accepted, any number of impossible permutations can be made and no one would even think to criticize them.  In its review of Gray's book, the Jewish Chronicle column also provides a revealing insight into the fraudulent allegations concerning gas-chambers: "Gray recalls that the floors of the gas chambers sloped, whereas another survivor who helped to build them maintains that they were at a level..."

Occasionally, books by former concentration camp inmates appear which present a totally different picture of the conditions prevailing in them.  Such is UNDER TWO DICTATORS (London, 1950) by Marguerite Buber.  She was a German-Jewish woman who had experienced several years in the brutal and primitive conditions of a Russian prison camp before being sent to Ravensbruck, the German camp for women detainees, in August 1940.  She noted that she was the only Jewish person in her contingent of deportees from Russia who was not straight away released from the Gestapo.  Her book presents a striking contrast between the camps of Soviet Russia and Germany; compared to the squalor, disorder and starvation of the Russian camp, she found Ravensbruck to be clean, civilized and well-administered.  Regular baths (showers) and clean linen seemed a luxury after her earlier experiences, and her first meal of white bread, sausage, sweet porridge and dried fruit prompted her to inquire of another camp inmate whether August 3rd, 1940 was some sort of holiday or special occasion.  She observed, too, that the barracks at Ravensbruck were remarkably specious compared to the crowded mud hut of the Soviet camp.  In the first months of 1945, she experienced the progressive decline of camp conditions, the causes of which we shall examine later.

Another account which is at total variance with popular propaganda is Die Gestapo Lasst Bitten (The Gestapo Invites You) by Charlotte Bormann, a Communist political prisoner who was also interned at Ravensbruck.  Undoubtedly its most important revelation is the author's statement that rumors of gas executions were deliberate and malicious inventions circulated among the prisoners by the Communists.  The latter group did not accept Marguerite Buber because of her imprisonment in Soviet Russia.  A further shocking reflection on the post-war trials is the fact that Charlotte Bormann was not permitted to testify at the Rastadt trial of Ravensbruck camp personnel in the French occupation zone, the usual fate of those who denied the extermination legend.

You say, "Well, these discounters can't be believed!"  Why?  You believe the exaggerated and totally impossible tales of the opposition which is far more heinous to believe!  I don't ask that you "believe" one against another--JUST LOOK AT THE FACTS!!!

Let us take a bit of a rest-break before we take up the subject of the nature and condition of those wartime concentration camps.  I would remind all of you that concentration camps are exactly what their name implies and in war, it means a very tacky situation at best.  There certainly were camps in which Death should have been the first name, but, precious ones, they seem to all be found inside the control of the Iron Curtain Communist Zionists.  It always comes back to haunt all of you, and MUST BE FACED!  And still, NONE can begin to compare with the horror of the Eisenhower Death Camps--NONE!

Hatonn to clear.  Please summon me when you are ready to proceed with the writing.  Thank you.

 

 

---

Source:  THE PHOENIX LIBERATOR, November 26, 1991, Volume 17, Number 6, Pages 19-21.

http://www.phoenixarchives.com/liberator/1991/1191/112691.pdf

Transcribed into HTML format by R. Montana.