6/4/92 #2   HATONN

You now have information from apparatus traveling out from your planet which has focused your attention on the importance of "collisions".  It becomes obvious to your scientists as they study data that these cosmic "crashes" are potent sculptors of the Solar System.  But are they actually?  Are they careless coincidental collisions, intended encounters, hap-hazard planning and/or supposition with no basis in fact?

The Sumerians made clear, 6,000 years earlier, the very same fact in question.  Central to their cosmogony, world view and religion was a cataclysmic event that they called the Celestial Battle.  It was an event to which references were made in miscellaneous Sumerian texts, hymns, and proverbs (go look them up)--just as you find in the Bible's books of Psalms, Proverbs, Job, and various others.  But the Sumerians also described the event in detail, step by step, in a long text that required seven tablets.  Hm-m-m, seven tablets?  Of its Sumerian original only fragments and quotations have been found; the mostly complete text has reached us in the Akkadian language, the language of the Assyrians and Babylonians who followed the Sumerians in Mesopotamia.  The text deals with the formation of the Solar System prior to the Celestial Battle and even more so with the nature, causes, and results of that awesome collision.  And, with a single cosmogonic premise, it explains puzzles that still baffle your astronomers and astrophysicists.

Even perhaps more important, whenever these modern scientists have come upon a satisfactory answer--it fits and corroborates the Sumerian one!

Prior to instrumental discoveries recently, the prevailing scientific viewpoint considered the Solar System as you see it today as the way it had taken shape soon after its beginning, formed by immutable laws of celestial motion and the force of gravity.  There have been oddballs, to be sure--meteorites that come from somewhere and collide with the stable member of the Solar System, pockmarking them with craters and comets that zoom about in greatly elongated orbits, appearing from somewhere and disappearing, it seems, to nowhere.  But these examples of cosmic debris, it has been assumed, go back to the very beginning of the Solar System, some 4.5 billion years ago, and are pieces of planetary matter that failed to be incorporated into the planets or their moons and rings.  A little more baffling has been the asteroid belt, a band of rocks that forms an orbiting chain between Mars and Jupiter.  According to Bode's Law, an empirical rule that explains why the planets formed where they did, there should have been a planet, at least twice the size of Earth, between Mars and Jupiter.  Is the orbiting debris of the asteroid belt the remains of such a planet?  The affirmative answer is plagued by two problems: the total amount of matter in the asteroid belt does not add up to the mass of such a planet, and there is no plausible explanation for what might have caused the breakup of such a hypothetical planet; if a celestial collision--when, with what, and why? Your scientists simply had no answer.

The realization that there had to be one or more major collisions that changed the Solar System from its initial form became inescapable  after the Uranus fly-by in 1986.  That Uranus was tilted on its side was already known from telescopic and other instrumental observations even before the Voyager encounter.  But, was it formed that way from the very beginning or did some external force--a forceful collision or encounter with something such as another major celestial body--bring about this tilting?  Let us consider: the fact that these moons swirl around the equator of Uranus in its tilted position--forming, all together, a kind of bull's-eye facing the Sun--made scientists wonder whether these moons were there at the time of the tilting event, or whether they formed after the event, perhaps from matter thrown out by the force of a collision.

 

SCIENTISTS SPECULATE

If the moons formed at the same time as Uranus, the celestial "raw material" from which they agglomerated should have condensed the heavier matter nearer the planet; there should be more of heavier, rocky material and thinner ice coats on the inner moons and a lighter combination of materials (more water ice, less rocks) on the outer moons.  By the same principle of the distribution of material in the Solar System--a larger proportion of heavier matter nearer the Sun, more of the lighter matter (in a "gaseous" state) farther out--the moons of the more distant Uranus should be proportionately lighter than those of the nearer Saturn.

But the findings revealed a situation contrary to these expectations.  In the comprehensive summary reports on the Uranus encounter published in 1986, it was concluded that the densities of the moon Miranda "are significantly heavier than those of the icy satellites of Saturn".  Likewise, data showed, again contrary to what "should have been", that the two larger inner moons of Uranus, Ariel and Umbriel, are lighter in composition (thick, icy layers; small, rocky cores) than the outer moons Titania and Oberon, which were discovered to be made mostly of heavy rocky material and had only thin coats of ice.

These findings were not the only clues suggesting that the moons of Uranus were not formed at the same time as the planet itself but rather some time later, in unusual circumstances.  Another discovery that puzzled the scientists was that the rings of Uranus were pitch-black, "blacker than coal dust", presumably composed of "carbon-rich material, a sort of primordial tar scavenged from outer space".  These dark rings, warped, tilted, and bizarrely elliptical, were quite unlike the symmetrical bracelets of icy particles circling Saturn.  Pitch-black also were six of the new moonlets discovered at Uranus, some acting as shepherds for the rings, if you will.  The obvious conclusion was that the rings and moonlets were formed from the debris of a violent event in Uranus's past. Your scientists thought it a likely possibility that an interloper from outside the Uranus system came in and struck a once larger moon sufficiently hard to have fractured it.  Would this not cause havoc on a planet or orb of any type?

The theory of a catastrophic celestial collision as the event that could explain all the odd phenomena on Uranus and its moons and rings was further strengthened by the discovery that the boulder-size black debris that forms the Uranus rings circles the planet once every eight hours--a speed that is twice the speed of the planet's own revolution around its axis.  This raises the question, how was this much-higher speed imparted to the debris in the rings?

Based on all the preceding data, the probability of a celestial collision emerged as the only plausible answer.  It was projected that in all probability the moons in point were created as a result of the probable collision of some sort that knocked Uranus on its side.  In press conferences your NASA scientists were more audacious. "A collision with something the size of Earth, traveling at about 40,000 miles per hour, could have done it", they said, speculating that it probably happened about four billion years prior.  In London, Astronomer Garry Hunt of the Imperial College simply proclaimed that "Uranus took an almighty bang early on."

But neither in the verbal briefings nor in the long written reports was an attempt made to suggest what the "something" was, where it had come from, and how it came from, and how it happened to collide with, or bang into, Uranus.

 

DOUBLE QUANDARY ARISES

Before we turn from knowledge or date acquired in the late 1970's and 1980's to what was already known over 6,000 years earlier, one more aspect of this puzzle should be scrutinized and pondered: Are the oddities at Neptune the result of collisions, or "bangs", unrelated to those of Uranus--or were they all the result of a single catastrophic event that affected all of the outer planets??

Before the Voyager 2 fly-by of Neptune, the planet was known to have only two satellites, Nereid and Triton.  Nereid was found to have a peculiar orbit: it was unusually tilted compared with the planet's equatorial plane (as much as 28 degrees) and was very eccentric--orbiting the planet not in a near-circular path but in a very elongated one, which takes the moon as far as six million miles from Neptune and as close as one million miles to the planet.  Nereid, although of a size that by planetary-formation rules should be spherical, has an odd shape like that of a twisted doughnut.  It also is bright on one side and pitch-black on the other.  All these peculiarities have led some to conclude that Nereid accreted into a moon around Neptune or another planet and that both it and Triton were knocked into their peculiar orbits by some large body or planet.  Imagine, one investigator boldly noted, "that at one time Neptune has an ordinary satellite system like that of Jupiter and Saturn; then some massive mystical body comes into the system and perturbs things a lot..."

It was presumed that the dark material that shows up on one side of Nereid could be explained in one of two ways--but both require a collision in this supposition.  Either an impact on one side of the satellite swept off an existing darker layer there, uncovering lighter material below the surface, or the dark matter belonged to the impacting body and "went splat on one side of Nereid".  That the latter possibility is the more seemingly plausible is suggested by the discovery, announced by the JPL team on August 29, 1989, that all the new satellites (six more) found by Voyager 2 at Neptune "are very dark" and "all have irregular shapes", even the moon designated 1989NI, whose size normally would have made it spherical.

The theories regarding Triton and its elongated and retrograde (clockwise) orbit around Neptune also seem to cry out for a collision event.

My gosh, it was postulated and presented in a "study" that "Triton was captured from a heliocentric orbit"--from an orbit around the Sun--"as a result of a collision with what was then one of Neptune's regular satellites."  In this scenario the original small Neptune satellite "would have been devoured by Triton", but the force of the collision would have been such that it dissipated enough of Triton's orbital energy to slow it down and be captured by Neptune's gravity.  Another theory, according to which Triton was an original satellite of Neptune, was shown by this same study to be faulty and unable to withstand critical analysis as is most often the case in the Light of true knowledge.  How about the game of "catch" or "ten-pens" or "pick-up-stix"?

Data collected from the fly-by of Triton supported this theoretical conclusion, it would seem.  It also was in accord with other studies that had showed Triton's internal heat and surface features could perhaps be explained only in terms of a collision from which Triton was captured into orbit around Neptune.

But, where could and did these impacting bodies come from?  Unanswered as well is the question of whether the cataclysms at Uranus and Neptune were aspects of a single event or were unconnected incidents.

IS IT NOT IRONIC BUT ALSO GRATIFYING TO FIND THAT THE ANSWERS TO ALL THESE PUZZLES ARE PROVIDED BY THE ANCIENT SUMERIAN TEXTS?  AND THAT ALL THE DATA DISCOVERED OR CONFIRMED ACTUALLY UPHOLD AND CORROBORATE THE SUMERIAN INFORMATION?

SUMERIAN TEXTS SAY--

The Sumerian texts speak of a single but comprehensive event.  Their texts explain more than what modern astronomers have been trying and trying to bring into some kind of explanation regarding the outer planets.  The ancient texts also explain matters closer to home, such as the origin of the Earth and its Moon, the Asteroid Belt, and THE PHOTON BELT!  And the comets.  The texts then go on to relate a tale that combines the credo of the Creationists with the theory of Evolution (gosh, do we have to get along also?), a tale that offers a more successful explanation than either modern conception of what happened on Earth and how man and his civilization came into being.

As regards the Photon Belt, the "Three Days of Darkness", etc., I shall have to take them in order of projection.  Once again, if you do not know what IS, how could you possibly deal with that which MIGHT be as a result of same?

What do the Sumerian texts tell you?  It all began when the Solar System was still quite young.  The Sun (APSU) in the Sumerian texts, meaning "One Who Exists from the Beginning "), its little companion MUM.MU ("One Who was Born", your Mercury) and farther away TI.AMAT ("Maiden of Life") were the first members of the Solar System.  It gradually expanded by the "birth" of three planetary pairs, the planets you call Venus and Mars between Mummu and Tiamat, the giant pair Jupiter and Saturn (to use their modern names) beyond Tiamat, and Uranus and Neptune farther out.

Into this original Solar System, still unstable soon after its formation billions of years ago, an Invader appeared.  The Sumerians called it NIBURU!  The Babylonians renamed it Marduk in honor of their national god.  (Anyone getting goose-bumps and squeamish twitters?)  It appeared from outer space, from "the Deep", in the words of the ancient text.  But, as it approached the outer planets of your Solar System, it began to be drawn into it.  As expected, the first outer planet to attract Niburu with its gravitational "pull" was Neptune--E.A. ("He Whose House is Water") in Sumerian.  "He who begot him was Ea, " the ancient text explained.

Nibiru/Marduk itself was a sight to behold; alluring, sparkling, lofty, lordly are some other adjectives used to describe it.  Sparks and flashes bolted from it to Neptune and Uranus as it passed near them.  It might have arrived with its own satellites already orbiting it, or it might have acquired some as a result of the "pull" of the outer planets.  The ancient text speaks of its "perfect members... difficult to perceive"--"four were his eyes, four were his ears".

CONTRARY STRANGER AT WORK

As it passed near Ea/Neptune, Nibiru/Marduk's side began to bulge "as though he had a second head".  Was it then that the bulge was torn away to become Neptune's moon Triton?  One aspect that speaks strongly for this is the fact that Nibiru/Marduk entered the Solar System in a retrograde (clockwise) orbit, counter to that of the other planets.  Only this Sumerian detail, according to which the invading planet was moving counter to the orbital motion of all the other planets, can explain the retrograde motion of Triton, the highly elliptical orbits of other satellites and comets, and the other major events that are yet to be tackled.

More satellites were created as Nibiru/Marduk passed by that "Anu brought forth and begot the four winds"--as clear a reference as one could hope for to the four major moons of Uranus that were formed, you now know, only during the collision that tilted Uranus.  At the same time you learn from a later passage in the ancient text that Nibiru/Marduk himself gained three satellites as a result of his encounter.

Although the Sumerian texts describe how, after its eventual capture into solar orbit, Nibiru/Marduk revisited the outer planets and eventually shaped them into the system as you know it today, the very first encounter already explains the various puzzles that modern astronomy faced or still faces regarding Neptune, Uranus, their moons, and their rings.

Coming in past Neptune and Uranus, Nibiru/Marduk was drawn even more into the midst of the planetary system as it reached the immense gravitational pulls of Saturn (AN.SHAR, "Foremost of the Heavens") and Jupiter (KI.SHAR, "Foremost of the Firm Lands").  As Nibiru/Marduk "approached and stood as thought in combat" near Anshar/Saturn, the two planets "kissed their lips".  It was then that the "destiny", the orbital path, of Nibiru/Marduk was changed forever.  It was also then that the chief satellite of Saturn, GA.GA (the eventual Pluto), was pulled away in the direction of Mars and Venus--a direction possible only by the retrograde force of Nibiru/Marduk. Making a vast elliptical orbit, Gaga eventually returned to the outermost reaches of the Solar System.  There is "addressed" Neptune and Uranus as it passed their orbits on the swing back.  It was the beginning of the process by which Gaga was to become your Pluto, with its inclined and peculiar orbit that sometimes takes it between Neptune and Uranus.

Now, as I am bombarded with myriads of inquiries, I ask that you not expect me to reply for we will write of these things as quickly as possible and you waste time in the "jumping" ahead to conclusions which are most often erroneous.  I would simply ask you to give me full definition (properly, not according to your dictionary) of "What is a starship"?  What IS a heavenly "body"? "What in the dickens are we talking about?"  I suggest it will be increasingly interesting and fully backed up by data left as will be this data as we project it now.

The new "destiny", orbital path, of Nibiru/Marduk was not irrevocably set toward the olden planet Tiamat.  At that time, relatively early in the formation of the Solar System, it was marked by instability, especially (you can see from the text in point) in the region of Tiamat.  While other planets nearby were still wobbling in their orbits, Tiamat was pulled into many directions by the two giants beyond her and the two smaller planets between her, and the Sun.  One result was the tearing off her, or the gathering around her, of a 'HOST' of satellites "furious with rage", in the poetic language of the text (named by learned scholars as the Epic of Creation).  These satellites, "roaring monsters", were "clothed with terror" and "crowned with halos", "swirling furiously about and orbiting as though they were celestial gods"--planets.

 

EARTH-BIRTH DRAMA

Most dangerous to the stability or safety of the other planets was Tiamat's "leader of the host", a large satellite that grew to almost planetary size and was about to attain its independent "destiny"--its own orbit around the Sun.  Tiamat "cast a spell for him, to sit among the celestial gods she exalted him."  It was called, in Sumerian, KIN.GU--"Great Emissary".

Now the text raised the curtain on the unfolding drama.  As in a Greek tragedy, the ensuing "celestial battle" was unavoidable as gravitational and magnetic forces came inexorably into play. Now, if you have forgotten the definition (AS GIVEN IN THE DISCUSSIONS OF "WHAT IS GOD" AND IN THE PLEIADES CONNECTIONS) of "gravity", I suggest you go look it-up before you pass on in this JOURNAL.  [But simply remember: "gravity" is the controller of light and LIGHT is the ONE THING in all Nature.].  This led to the "collision" between the oncoming Nibiru/Marduk with its seven satellites ("winds" in the ancient text) and Tiamat and its "host" of eleven satellites headed by Kingu.

Although they were headed on a collision course, Tiamat orbiting counterclockwise and Nibiru/Marduk clockwise, the two planets did not collide--a fact of cardinal astronomical importance. It was the satellites, or "winds", (literal Sumerian meaning" "Those that are by the side") of Nibiru/Marduk that smashed into Tiamat and collided with her satellites.

In the first such encounter, the first phase of the Celestial Battle as written:

The four winds he stationed that nothing of her could escape:

 

The South Wind, the North WInd, the East Wind, the West Wind.  Close to his side he held the net, the gift of his grandfather Anu who brought forth the Evil Wind, the Whirlwind and the Hurricane....

He sent forth the winds which he had created, the seven of them; to trouble Tiamat within they rose up behind him.

These "winds", or satellites, of Nibiru/Marduk, "the seven of them", were the principal "weapons" with which Tiamat was attacked in the first phase of the Celestial Battle.  But the invading planet had other "weapons" with which Tiamat was attacked in the first phase of the Celestial Battle.  But the invading planet had other "weapons" too:

In front of him he set the lightning, with a blazing flame he filled his body;

he then made a net to enfold Tiamat therein....

A fearsome halo his head was turbaned,

He was wrapped with awesome terror as with a cloak.

As the two planets and their hosts of satellites came close for Nibiru/Marduk to "scan the inside of Tiamat" and "perceive the scheme of Kingu", Nibiru/Marduk attacked Tiamat with his "net"  (magnetic field) to "enfold her", shooting at the old planet immense bolts of electricity ("divine lightnings").  Tiamat "was filled with brilliance--slowing down, heating up, "becoming distended". Wide gaps opened in its crust, perhaps emitting steam and volcanic matter.  Into one widening fissure Nibiru/Marduk thrust one of its main satellites, the one called "Evil Wind".  It tore Tiamat's "belly, cut through her insides, splitting her heart."

CREATION OF THE COMETS

Besides splitting up Tiamat and "extinguishing her life", the first encounter sealed the fate of the moonlets orbiting her--all except the planet-like Kingu.  Caught in the "net"--the magnetic and gravitational pull--of Nibiru/Marduk, "shattered, broken up", the members of the "band of Tiamat" were thrown off their previous course and forced into new orbital paths in the opposite direction: "TREMBLING WITH FEAR, THEY TURNED THEIR BACKS ABOUT."

Thus were the comets created--thus, you learn from a 6,000-year-old text, did the comets obtain their greatly elliptical and retrograde orbits.  As to Kingu, Tiamat's principal satellite, the text informs you that in that first phase of the celestial collision, Kingu was just deprived of its almost-independent orbit.  Nibiru/Marduk took away from him his "destiny".  Nibiru/ Marduk made Kingu into a DUG.GA.E, "a mass of lifeless clay", devoid of atmosphere, waters and radioactive matter and shrunken in size; and "with fetters bound him", to remain in orbit around the battered Tiamat.

Having vanquished Tiamat, Nibiru/Marduk sailed on to his new "destiny".  The Sumerian text leaves no doubt that the erstwhile invader orbited the Sun:

He crossed the heavens and surveyed the regions, and Apsu's quarter he measured, The Lord the dimensions of the Apsu measured.

Having circled the Sun (Apsu), Nibiru/Marduk continued into distant space.  But now caught forever in solar orbit, it had to turn back.  On his return round, Ea/Neptune was there to greet him and Anshar/Saturn hailed his victory.  Then his new orbital path returned him to the scene of the Celestial Battle, "turned back to Tiamat whom he had bound".

The Lord paused to view her lifeless body.

 

To divide the monster he then artfully planned.

Then as a mussel, he split her into two parts.

With this act the creation of "the heaven" reached a magnificent stage, and the creation of Earth and its Moon was begun.  First the new impacts broke Tiamat into two halves.  The upper part, her "skull", was struck by the Nibiru/Marduk satellite called North Wind; the blow carried it, and with it Kingu, "to places that have been unknown"--to a brand-new orbit where there had not been a planet before.  The Earth and your Moon were created.

ASTEROID BELT FORMED

The other half of Tiamat was smashed by the impacts into bits and pieces.  This lower half, her "tail", was "hammered together" to become a "bracelet" in the heavens:

Locking the pieces together, as watchmen he stationed them....

He bent Tiamat's tail to form the Great Band as the bracelet.

Thus was "the Great Band", the Asteroid Belt, created.  Having disposed of Tiamat and Kingu, Nibiru/Marduk once again "crossed the heavens and surveyed the regions".  This time his attention was focused on the "Dwelling of Ea" (Neptune), giving that planet and its twinlike Uranus their final makeup.  Nibiru/Marduk also, according to the ancient text, provided Gaga/Pluto with its final "destiny", assigning it to "a hidden place"--a hitherto unknown part of the heavens.  It was farther out than Neptune's location; it was, we are told, "in the Deep"--far out in space.  In line with its new position as the outermost planet, it was granted a new name: US.MI--"He Who Shows the Way", the first planet encountered coming into the Solar System--that is, from outer space toward the Sun.

Thus was Pluto created and put into the orbit it now holds.  Having thus "constructed the stations" for the planets, Nibiru/Marduk made two "abodes" for itself.  One was in the "Firmament", as the asteroid belt was also called in the ancient texts; the outer far out "in the Deep" was called the "Great/Distant Abode", alias E.SHARRA (Abode/Home of the Ruler/Prince").  Modern astronomers call these two planetary positions the perigee (the orbital point nearest the Sun) and the apogee (the farthest one).  It is an orbit that takes some 3,600 Earth-years to complete as written earlier on a couple of days past.

THE TWELFTH PLANET

Thus did this Invader that came from outer space become the twelfth member of your Solar System, a system made up of the Sun in the center, with its long-time companion.  Mercury; the three older pairs (Venus and Mars, Jupiter and Saturn, Uranus and Neptune); the Earth and the Moon, the remains of the great Tiamat, though in a new position; the newly independent Pluto; and the planet that put it all into final shape, Nibiru/Marduk.

Modern astronomy and recent discoveries uphold and corroborate this millennia-old information, chelas.  I care not what you WANT to believe--Truth will stand the course of all "time".  The "time" is at hand for the revealing of this information so that you can know of that which awaits.  Much of what will happen is solely dependent upon that which you do as a species.  For I am speaking of God, Truth and Power within those "things".

Please take these things within your being for in the Truth lies the answers for your civilization and progression of your own beings.  May you be given in understanding, that which is lovingly handed unto you.

When we take up this subject next, we will speak of this projection "In the beginning".  For it has great interest as spouted forth in the books.

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth

And the earth was without form and void and darkness was upon

the face of the deep, and the Spirit of God moved upon the face

And God said, Let there be Light' and there was Light.

It is sad that both sides of the "argument" of creation pay almost no heed to what has been known for more than a century even in your counting.  The truth lies in the unabbreviated versions of much more detailed Mesopotamian texts of the Sumerians.

Why does man always turn unto the liars and cheats, and only in the final failing does he come unto God?

Hatonn to clear, please.

 

 

---

 

Source: THE PHOENIX LIBERATOR, June 16, 1992, Volume 19, Number 9.

http://www.phoenixarchives.com/liberator/1992/0692/061692.pdf

THANK YOU Rocky Montana