6/8/92 #1   HATONN

You ones must be in consideration of the investigations focused on other of your planets wherein you can see that things are not as were speculated upon as being only a short while in your past.

Let us consider findings of the Mariner 9 which confirmed and augmented the results of the Viking I and Viking 2 missions launched five years later; they examined Mars both from orbiters and from landers that descended to the planet's surface. They showed such features as evidence of several floodings by large quantities of water in an area designated Chryse Planitis; channels that once held and were formed by running water coming from the Vallis Marineris area; cyclical meltings of permafrost in the equatorial regions; rocks weathered and eroded by the force of water; and evidence by the force of water; and evidence of erstwhile lakes, ponds, and other "water basins".

Let us remember from those recordings from the probes that water vapor was found in the thin Martian atmosphere; Charles A. Barth, the principal scientist in charge of Mariner 9's ultraviolet measurements, estimated that the evaporation amounted to the equivalent of 100,000 gallons of water daily.  Norman Horowitz of Caltech reasoned that "large amounts of water in some form have in past eons been introduced to the surface and into the atmosphere of Mars", because that was required in order to have so much carbon dioxide (90 percent) in the Martian atmosphere.  Then in publishing results of the Viking project, it was concluded that "a long time ago giant flash floods carved the Martian landscape in a number of places; a volume of water equal to Lake Erie poured...scouring great channels."

The final NASA report after the Viking missions (Mars: The Viking Discoveries) concluded that "Mars once had enough water to form a layer several meters deep over the whole surface of the planet".

How did they actually come to conclusions in agreement?  They projected that this was possible because Mars (like Earth) wobbles slightly as it spins about its axis.  This action results in significant climatic changes every 50,000 years.  When the planet was warmer it may have had lakes as large as Earth's Great Lakes in North America and as much as three miles deep.  "This is an almost inescapable conclusion", stated Michael H. Carr and Jack McCauley of the U.S. Geological Survey in 1985.  "1985"?  How many years do you think there were up to 1985?  Please, chelas, be in reasoning--conclusions drawn in 1985 are like "finally" being drawn this day and still, these are only "conclusions" and not proven points of fact.

What I am trying to reach through to your reasoning mind and say, is that you can't have known very much after some cataclysmic happening occurred and caused a "dark ages" aboard your own starship.  These things are only now coming into your knowledge flow.  Worse, however, the information is now balanced against that which is KNOWN from other resources of controlled information and fed to you in bits and pieces of erroneous, mixed with valid, information.

The outcome of the joint scientific studies between the Soviets and the U.S. A. NASA regarding "Mars landings" conclude that some deep Martian canyons are probably still flowing water in their depths, or at least just below the dry riverbeds.  How quaint.

What had started out as a dry and barren planet has emerged, in the past decade, as a planet where water was once abundant--not just passively lying about but flowing and gushing, and shaping the planet's features.  Mars has joined Venus and Earth in corroborating the concept of the Sumerian texts of water "below the Firmament", on the inner planets.

ASTEROID BELT SEPARATION?

The ancient assertion that the asteroid belt separated the waters that were below the Firmament from those that were above it implies that there was water on the celestial bodies that are located farther out.  We have already reviewed the later discoveries which confirm the Sumerian description of Uranus and Neptune as "watery".  What about the outer two celestial bodies that are orbiting between those two outer planets and the asteroid belt, Saturn and Jupiter?

Saturn itself, a gaseous giant whose volume is more than eight hundred times greater than that of Earth, as described by scientists, has not yet been penetrated by scientists, has not yet been penetrated down to its surface--assuming it has, somewhere below its vast atmosphere of hydrogen and helium, a solid or liquid core.  But its various moons as well as its breathtaking rings are now known to be made, if not wholly then in large part, of water ice and perhaps even liquid water.  This is what your astronomers and scientific computer analysts say so surely you can believe them?

They continue by telling you that originally, Earth-based observation of Saturn showed only seven rings; it is now known from space probes that there are many more, with thinner rings and thousands of ringlets filling the spaces between the seven major rings; all together they create the effect of a disk that, like a photograph record, is "grooved" with rings and ringlets.  The unmanned spacecraft Pioneer II established in 1979 that the rings and ringlets consist of icy material, believed at the time to be small pieces of ice a few inches in diameter or as small as snowflakes.  But what of invisible photon rings?  Who ever mentions these little perturbations?

MORE ON PHOTON BELT

What about these little invisible particles which can destroy your entire species in a period of time with no protection?  I repeat--what about those "holes" wherein already are pouring these photon waves upon you?  The government lies to you--you are moving into the Photon Belt right on schedule and they are giving you hogwash about "ozone holes" and nonsense about "skin cancers".

Can man survive such a passage?  Indeed, if care is taken for you will be under the influence of multiple "suns".  This is why we encourage "clusters" of domes overcovered by large "shade" domes so that most activities can be done without full-time exposure to these elements.  Indeed, man can not only survive, but flourish in the presence of such Light if handled properly.  After adjustment and a period of "mutation", plants and animals who dwell in the open will flourish incredibly well.  Because of your adaptation to luxury indoor climate control, you are the ones at risk.  This is, however, why the prophets will tell you that the animals will be quite well adjusted "outside" during that period of "Light" which would blind and burn your human bodies.  Outdoor dwellers will also manage very well with a minimal eye protection.  This, of course, is IF the human interferers keep out of the equation.  If you ignite radioactive belts, etc., you will have other problems with which to contend.  Already a thrust for sunglasses which close out ultra-violet rays are marketed--why do you think this is so?  Human can easily evolve protective changes if given a bit of "time" to do so--it is the suddenness which is devastating.  As with any X-rays, protection of minimal amounts will be more than adequate.  HOWEVER:

 

STERILIZATION WILL OCCUR

NEXT BUG-A-BOO: One of the major reasons why the government will not allow you to be told of the upcoming Photon Belt is because STERILIZATION OF THE SPECIES will occur through exposure to the rays for ones who are exposed without protection. This will cause a massive drop in offspring in the immediate upcoming generation of population.  How better to snuff out the prospective "next generation"?  There simply will only be the "select" few who will be able to have children.

This is why the Revelation prophecies state that it will be most bad for ones who are with child--the mutations will abound in the first birthing of already forming babies and recently conceived babes.  There will be massive spontaneous abortions and malformed births, most of which will not survive and in the hardships upcoming, will perish.  There will be a massive annihilation of any surviving mutants.

Again, chelas, ye become angry with ME; do you think I make up these tales to give you on "scare night at the movies"?  The prophecies have been before you since the beginning of your planet.

This is, however, why I suggest that as you move into the Photon Belt, you must also have facilities for protection of you "bearing" cattle, fowl, etc.  Most will fare alright on their own but they, too, shall become sterile if left to exposure of great magnitude for a long period of time until adjustment can be accomplished.  This would, be necessary, at any rate, for the planet would be overrun by animals and the species of human would be destroyed in time.

DAMAGE TO BRAIN FUNCTION

Next bugs-in-the-BOO:  The rays will destroy the brain functioning if not protected.  If you cannot imagine a planet filled with dying, blind--and totally insane persons--I suggest you begin to do so NOW.  Just as with continued doses of radiation, the brain cells are killed off and you will surely be back to a planet of dying humanity who can function only at "cave-man" level, if that efficiently.  This is as much the reason for "dark ages" as anything that happens to a planet.  This is what would cyclically depopulate a planet in the natural order of things.  This is why man "could" save selves but will not.  Good news?  Bad news?  No, it just IS news.  It should not be "news" for it is as old, likewise, as the beginning of the planet.

Taking up again with snowflakes, let us continue.  What was originally described as "a carousel of bright icy particles" was revealed, however, by data to consist of chunks of ice ranging from boulder size to that of "big houses".  You are seeing "a sea of sparkling ice" said JPL's scientists.  The ice, at some primordial time, had been liquid water.  By the way, these are the SAME scientists who tested the material left by Semjase and Pleiadians with Billy Meier and "lost" the samples.

The several larger moons of Saturn at which the three spacecraft took a look, appeared to have much more water, and not only in the form of ice.  It was reported in 1979 that the group of inner moons of Saturn--Janus, Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, and Rhea--appeared to be "icy bodies...consisting largely of ice.  It was confirmed in 1980 that these inner satellites as well as newly discovered moonlets were "spheres of ice".  On Enceladus, which was examined more closely, the indications were that its smooth plains resulted from the filling in of old craters with liquid water that had oozed up to the surface and then frozen.

It was also revealed that Saturn's outer moons were icy covered.  The moon Lapetus, which has puzzled astronomers because it showed dark and bright portions, was found to be "coated with water ice" in the bright areas.  Voyager 2 seemed to confirm in 1981 that Lapetus was "primarily a ball of ice with some rock in its center".  The data, Von R. Eshleman of Stanford University concluded, indicated that Lapetus was 55 percent water ice, 35 percent rock, 10 percent frozen methane.  Saturn's largest moon, Titan--larger than the planet Mercury--was found to have an atmosphere and a surface rich in hydrocarbons.  But under them there is a mantle of frozen ice, and some sixty miles farther down, as the internal heat of this celestial body increases, there is a thick layer of water slush.  Farther down, it is now believed, there probably exists a layer of bubbling hot water more than 100 miles deep.  All in all, the Voyagers' data suggested that Titan is 15 percent rock and 85 percent water and ice.

Is Saturn itself a larger version of Titan, its largest moon?  Well, you could wait for future missions and see what they provide--or you can turn and study the Sumerian texts, and KNOW NOW.  It's up to you.

JUPITER HAS WATER

Jupiter was investigated by probes called Pioneer 10 and Pioneer 11 AND by the two Voyagers according to your public information allowed sharing with you in some portion.  The results indicated that there were no differences than found at Saturn. The giant gaseous planet was found to emit immense amounts of radiation and heat, and to be engulfed by a thick atmosphere that is subject to violent storms.  Yet even this impenetrable envelope was found to be constituted primarily of hydrogen, helium, methane, ammonia, water vapor, and probably droplets of water; somewhere farther down inside the thick atmosphere there is liquid water, the scientists have concluded.

As with Saturn, the moons of Jupiter proved more fascinating, revealing, and surprising than the planet itself.  Of the four Galilean moons, Io, the closest to Jupiter, revealed totally unexpected volcanic activity. Although what the volcanoes spew is mostly sulphur based, the erupted material contains some water. The surface to Io shows vast plains with troughs running through them, as if they had been carved by running water. The consensus is that Io has "some internal sources of water".

Europa, like Io, appears to be a rocky body, but its somewhat lower density suggests that it may contain more internal water than Io.  Its surface shows a latticework of veinlike lines that suggested to the NASA teams shallow fissures in a sea of frozen ice.  A close look at Europa by Voyager 2 revealed a layer of mushy water ice under the cracked surface.  At the December 1984 meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco, two scientists of NASA's Ames Research Center suggested that under Europa's ice sheet there might exist warmer oases of liquid water that could sustain living organisms.  After a reexamination of Voyager 2 photographs, NASA scientists tentatively concluded that the spacecraft witnessed volcanic eruptions of water and ammonia from the moon's interior.  The belief now is that Europa "has an ice covering several miles thick" overlaying an ocean of liquid water up to thirty miles deep, kept from freezing by radioactive decay and the friction of tidal forces.  Eee-gads.  Well, be glad Hatonn is presenting this information instead of Soltec (Senior Geophysical authority) who sits to my right elbow and is about having a hemorrhage.  Never mind, chelas, you have to have the idiot blather and speculation so that you can better appreciate the TRUTH.

Ganymede, the largest of Jupiter's moons, appears to be covered with water ice mixed with rock, suggesting it has undergone moonquakes that have cracked its crust of frozen ice.  It is thought to be made almost entirely of water ice, with an inner ocean of liquid water near its core.  The fourth Galilean moon, Callisto--about the size of the planet Mercury--also has an ice-rich crust; under it there are mush and liquid water surrounding a small, rocky core.  Estimates are that Callisto is more than 50 percent water.  A ring discovered around Jupiter is also made mostly, if not wholly, of ice particles.

Modern science seems to have confirmed the ancient assertion to the fullest: there indeed have been "waters ABOVE the Firmament".

 

OTHER, UNSEEN PLANETS

Jupiter is the Solar System's largest planet (visible)--as large as 1,300 Earths.  It contains some 90 percent of the mass of the complete planetary system of the Sun.  I suggest that when you come into "visibility" you will suddenly discover you are surrounded by unseen planets and stars.  These ones would have been totally obscured by photons through which your vision was incapable of witness.  As the entire system "speeds up" in frequency to accommodate these new "X-rays", you will find a whole universe of wondrous new additions.

As stated a bit earlier, the Sumerians called Jupiter KI.SHAR, "Foremost of the Firm Lands", of the planetary bodies. "Foremost"???

From whose perception might that be written?  Saturn, though smaller than Jupiter, occupies a much larger potion of the heavens because of its rings, whose "disk" has a diameter of 670,000 miles.  The Sumerians called it AN.SHAR, "Foremost of the Heavens".  "Foremost"???  From whose perception might that be written?  Ah so!

Evidently the Sumerians knew what they were talking about?

LET'S LOOK AT YOUR SUN

When you can view the Sun with the unclothed eye, say, at dawn or at sunset, it appears to be a perfect disk.  Even when viewed with telescopes, it has the shape of a perfect globe.  Yet the Sumerians depicted it as a disk with triangular rays extending from its round surface.  Why?

In 1980, astronomers of the High Altitude Observatory of the University of Colorado took pictures of the Sun with a special camera during an eclipse observed in a location in the country of India.  The pictures revealed that because of magnetic influences, the Sun's corona gives it the appearance of a disk with triangular rays extending from its surface--just as the Sumerians had depicted millennia earlier.

 

SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN DILEMMA

In January of 1983 an author named ZECHARIA SITCHIN, born in Russia and raised in Palestine, an Economics/History professor, brought this "enigmatic representation" which was on a Sumerian "cylinder seal" to the attention of the editor of Scientific American, a journal that reported the astronomers' discovery.  In response, the editor, Dennis Flanagan, wrote to him on January 27, 1983:

"Thank you for your letter of January 25.

"What you have to say is most interesting, and we may well be able to publish it."

"In addition to the many puzzles posed by this depiction, "he had written in his letter, "foremost of which is the source of the Sumerian knowledge, is now their apparent familiarity with the true shape of the Sun's corona."

Do you suppose it is the need to acknowledge the source of Sumerian knowledge THAT IS STILL HOLDING UP PUBLICATION OF WHAT 'SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN' HAS DEEMED "MOST INTERESTING"?  What would be your best guess?

Dharma, allow us to close hereat for the writing grows long.  I wish to put the rest couple of segments to tape this afternoon for we will get too far behind if we do not.  The next segment begins to get really interesting so I would like to clear the backlog a bit if you would be able to backlog a bit if you would be able to make yourself available for that specific task.  We will be taking up "The Messengers of Genesis" when we next write on the subject of the "Divine Plan".

Hatonn to clear, please.  Blessings rest upon you who are willing to see and hear for upon your shoulders rests the survival of a species.  Salu.

 

 

---

 

Source: THE PHOENIX LIBERATOR, June 16, 1992, Volume 19, Number 9.

http://www.phoenixarchives.com/liberator/1992/0692/061692.pdf

THANK YOU Rocky Montana