Subject: "Judges as Criminals" [in N.H.]

Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:25:21 -0400

To:

Citizens for Legal Responsibility(R)

Re: "Judges as Criminals"

http://www.clr.org/crimjudg.html

Dear Sirs:

--This is to follow-up my just reading your excellent 2-page website on the 70% print-out, with highlighted sections as follows, thank you "very" much:

--"TRESPASSERS OF THE LAW":  "If a court is 'without authority, its judgments and orders are regarded as nullities.  They are not voidable, but simply void; and form no bar*** to a recovery** sought, even prior to a reversal**** in opposition to them.  They constitute no justification; and all persons concerned in executing(*) such judgments or sentences, are considered, in law, as trespassers.' Elliot v. Piersol, 1 Pet. 328, 340, 26 U.S. 328, 340 (1828)". [re: the execution(*) thereof by the U.S. Marshals, in a federal case.]

--Please see my posts as Replies over at the New Hampshire Underground website of: http://nhunderground.com/forum/index.php?topic=3868.7115 about the Ed Brown case, of his battles against the evil I.R.S.

--According to your citing of the Cooper case, these battles are withIN a "war", because: "The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that 'No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it.' Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1; 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)." that includes "Any judge" as you wrote under the TREASON paragraph, state and/or federal, with you "compiling a list of laws detailing the penalties for treason."  (**)

--Now, would you please forward to me this list if so obtained, so that we here in New Hampshire, can start the process of a check and balance for this situation here.

--With the on-going federal court trial in Concord, N.H. today of the three co-conspirators, it still in the prosecution phase, I'd like to put a "monkey-wrench" into the works by filing a Petition for an Habeas Corpus with the Merrimack County Superior Court that covers Concord, New Hampshire, as the seat or capitol of our state. An Art. 14 + 91 petition "free" of charge by our N.H. Constitution, that is sometimes violated by these clerks demanding a filing fee up-front! with their rules somehow over-riding THE Constitution!  Them serving at the pleasure of the judges who appoint them, and so writing this with a cc: to her son* in advance of such a possible block to maybe pay now, and argue later.

--Tomorrow Elaine (Mrs. Ed) Brown is being brought up from Danbury, Connecticut to testify in the case, but before they attempt to return her to there, I'd like to see to it that justice be done by one of our state judges to set up a day and time that SAME day to "recover"** one of our state citizens, for which the feds have no "bar"*** action against, and "even prior to a reversal"**** by their own federal court!

--The evidence against the Feds is a photocopy of the certificate of non filing from the N.H.  Secretary of State to them/ the Feds having never complied with N.H. R.S.A. Ch. 123:1 http://www.state.nh.us (click left side for "Laws and Rules") as indexed for within all states thanks to Attorney Larry Beecraft of Huntsville, Alabama over at http://www.constitution.org/juris/fjur/1fj-ba.htm of his list of single and double-filing states (as in with the Registry of Deeds too). N.H. being a double-filing state in non-compliance. The certificates of Sept. 10, 2001 (pre 9-11), and the latest of last Wed., March 26th '08 proving it by latest update.

--Now from the website just below yours on page 1 #1 of http://www.google.com for the word: "violation of oath of office" in quotes, there's the link to http://foavc.org/file.php/1/Articles/5%20U.S.C.%207311.htm for Title 5 U.S. Code Section 7311(1): "An individual may not accept or HOLD a position in the Government of the United States of the government of the District of Columbia if he (1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government..." (emphasis ADDed for not the invited/ visiting Judge George Singal, Chief judge from Portland, Maine, but the appointing judge, Stephen McAuliffe of N.H.)

--The overthrow being, in effect, saying to hell with Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution with the word "Consent".  New Hampshire gave consent to the Feds back on June 14, 1883, but what type of consent was it?  It was a "conditional" consent upon the filing of the papers, that never occurred.  Even the Federal Archives on Trapello Rd., in Waltham, MA has no such receipt for the possibility of it as having been filed, but maybe lost or stolen. My e-mail letter to the General Services Administration (of last Friday) to "correct" this as further proof, and to prevent ex-post facto justice! which letter I'd be glad to send to you with today's reply as promised from Deborah there.

--The penalty for violation thereof 5 USC 7311(1) being in 18 USC 1918 for a fine of up to $______ +/or no more than one year imprisonment, according to http://foavc.org/file.php/1/Articles/18%20U.S.C.%201918.htm that I'd like to see visited upon this judge and his "arm of the court" marshal(s), reminding them of the four, yes four freedom keepers having been incarcerated ever since mid Sept. 2007, and so for OVER six (6) months !!!!!! that the feds consider as appropriate for the "petty" offense of contempt of court, thus for contempt of the Constitution violators deserving of MORE time!

Yours truly, - - - - - - - - - - - Joe / Joseph S. Haas, P. O. Box 3842, Concord, N.H. 03302, Tel. 603: 848-6059 (cell phone).