The day was March 21, 2008. Instead of Oregonians in the Willamette Valley flocking to Good Friday services at local churches they rushed to auditoriums by the thousands to hear Democrat presidential candidate Barack Obama preach his social gospel of liberation theology (Marxism/class warfare), which he learned under the tutelage of his pastor of 20 years, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Only a few talk show heads have mentioned the phrase “liberation theology” but no one actually explains it.

Barack’s campaign has been called “Obama’s first coming” and some of his supporters refer to him as “something akin to a messiah.” I’m sure his competent campaign staffers researched Oregon before he visited and found how liberal we are, so he continued on his liberal mantra, baiting voters in Oregon -- promising everything but the kitchen sink to the enthusiastic crowds, young and old. Like rock star groupies, they crowded in close to shake his hand or touch him. Former Democrat presidential candidate and New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, at his side in Portland, said he decided to give his endorsement to Barack after he heard his “racism” speech wherein Barack endeavored to calm the waters after his pastor’s rants against America. Richardson called Barack a “once-in-a-lifetime leader” who will be a “historic and great president.”

Social engineers decided long ago that by crowding people into cities, they were less able to think or reason as individuals and they could get people to believe almost anything as they indoctrinated them with cradle-to-grave government involvement in their personal lives. I’m guessing Barack’s reception on the other side of the mountain in Eastern Oregon, where they still carry their shotguns on racks in their pickups, would have been far different than that first crowd of admirers in Portland. The only people in Portland who carry guns are the police and criminals. Those with concealed gun permits don’t flaunt it.

The capital of Salem about an hour south of Portland was Barack’s second stop at noon where he addressed questions about race, immigration and health care. Another hour south and he appeared in Eugene, home of University of Oregon-- known as "Marxist U” to certain Oregonians. He made an unscheduled stop in Corvallis, another college town, for pizza. He ended his tour near the California border in Medford, where the turnout may not have been quite as welcoming as those in the liberal Willamette Valley.

The hoards of pandering journalists reported he didn’t seem tired from all his campaigning as he addressed the crowds who turned out to see him. With all the money he has raised from individuals, he may have been able to buy his own airplane with sleeping accommodations. His very first stop in the morning in Portland was a trip to the gym for his daily workout, which keeps him in shape -- we all should be in such good shape as Barack.

I remember when I saw President Truman in my small hometown; he spoke to us from the platform of the last car on the train especially provided for him as he visited towns across America. Those who lived a distance from the railroad did not even know he was in town until they read about it in the local weekly paper but today we have instantaneous coverage from the comfort of our own homes miles from Barack’s appearances.

One attendee said she turned out to see him in person rather than just see him on TV. Others said they loved him. Some seemed to have camped in their lawn chairs in front of the facility. He itched their ears with the promise of universal health care and ending the Iraq war. The move towards universal health care mostly started for Americans back in the 1960s under Lyndon Johnson’s “compassionate” policy. From that time a visit to the doctor went from costing less than $10 to hundreds today, affordable only through insurance payments. Now the Democrats claim the Republicans pamper and protect the insurance industry. Barack, like Hillary, is talking universal health care – a system that is mathematically unachievable without huge tax increases. Beware: “Free” Medical Care Can Kill You – on purpose!

Barack wants more money for schoolteachers and the young people became excited over the promise of a free college education. But did they hear him say they’d have to repay their debt to Big Brother by volunteering in such government programs as the Peace Corps? Compulsory service is not volunteer anything! This current generation of young people has been programmed to volunteer under America 2000, Outcome Based Education (Pavlov), cooperative learning, global education, mastery learning, etc. so they are prepared to accept enslavement in order to get something for “free.” The names of this indoctrination have changed frequently in order to cover up its goal. Most people recognize Ivan Pavlov, who long ago showed that the nervous system of animals – his famous laboratory dogs – could be regulated and controlled by the processes we now call brainwashing.[1] Speaking of education, I wonder if Barack has his daughters in public school or are they in an exclusive private institution? The news has reported that they are getting some indoctrination in their parents' church.

In 1902 Pavlov introduced the concept of the conditioned reflex, but he warned against generalizing from salivating dogs to human beings - a warning that went unheeded. In the book Brave New World by Aldous Huxley he writes about experimental infant nurseries, neo-Pavlovian conditioning rooms. Today’s mothers have been brainwashed to believe they are worthless if they don't have another job outside the home so they drop their infants off at a daycare. While the more enlightened mothers felt their place was in the home for the early years with the child, the tax structure forced them to go to work outside their home. The bottom line: The U.S. implemented the old U.S.S.R. education plan. Children went from daycare, to preschool, to kindergarten and into school – from womb to the tomb has become acceptable and this is the reason Barack is so popular with the group-thinking, indoctrinated masses!!!

Carol Belt, from Englewood, CO, wrote about America 2000 in a long series in the Wisconsin Report in 1992, which she called “Education or Indoctrination” – a New World View. Taking excerpts from that series, Carol quoted from Marilyn Ferguson's The Aquarian Conspiracy, she said the paradigm change is a transformation, a new perspective or insight that allows information to come together in a new structure, a harmony of ideas made into powerful synthesis (common agreement/consensus). Ferguson is a New Ager who says the key to our global problems is our tendency “to take and not give, to accept and not share, to grasp and not to distribute.” This falls right in line with another New Ager, Queen of TV, Oprah Winfrey and her current “Big Give.” The rest of us are just too selfish so Miss Oprah has to teach people how to give!

Carol says “A Change in Kind,” a position paper by Edward B. Larsh written for the Strategic Options (SOI) Summer Institute IV at Snowmass, Colorado, July 1990 states: “…the paradigm shift from inputs to outcomes occurs because restructuring is not a synonym for improvement.” I have put some words in bold print because they are the words in general usage by the change agents. In other words, all the money the taxpayers stuck into education restructuring in the late '80s and early '90s that they thought would improve academics was nothing more than another cruel joke on the parents and taxpayers. Children are still woefully lacking in spelling, reading and general math without a calculator. Carol continues with a quote from Shirley McCune, instrumental in creating the new curriculum, “Improvement focuses on bettering the state of the art. Restructuring, because it is a response to changes in the external environment already affecting schools, allows for significant shifts away from what has been done in the past…” This change required a new curriculum and the outcomes are always value-laden. Now if you don’t understand all this nonsense, it is meant to be that way. Translation: The old traditional Christian value system that has served us so well is no longer acceptable even though Ecclesiastes in the Bible says “there’s nothing new under the sun.” In other words, things and people never change but the social scientists are determined to have us make that change and the noncompliant public school students are labeled with “learning disabilities” and drugged with experimental medicines.

I’ll have to admit I’ve really been enjoying what Rush Limbaugh calls “Operation Chaos” in the Democrat Party. It was the Democrats that pushed for affirmative action, which promoted minorities, including women, ahead of the white man and now we have a woman and a black man running for president on the Democrat ticket and the infighting is escalating. The claws are coming out. I guess they should have been careful about what they wanted because they got a “Dream Team,” a double dose of affirmative action -- and can you imagine what might happen if Hillary Clinton gets the nomination for president, contrary to the predictions of many “experts.” Things in politics can happen very rapidly. Many Ron Paul supporters refuse to vote for McCain. McCain was broke and out a few months ago but after some other candidates were persuaded by “the powers that be” to drop out and allow McCain to be the chosen candidate for the GOP, he’s now the leading candidate. Then there is the rumor that blacks will vote for McCain and Limbaugh supporters have reregistered to vote for Hillary in their upcoming Primary because Limbaugh has them believing Hillary will be easier to beat than Barack in the general election. I have never in my lifetime experienced such mass confusion.

David Gergen, a CNN political analyst, says he thinks people make decisions on whether they’d like to have that person in their living room. This is a big mistake! Even though he knew he was going to be betrayed, Jesus allowed Judas at the Last Supper. Preference over conviction is a poor way to elect someone to the highest office in the land. Barack’s voting record shows he is even Left of Hillary!

Our Constitutional framers gave us a republic – a representative, limited government based on God’s laws and even questioned whether we could keep it, which we did for more than a hundred years; however, ever so gradually as We the People slept, our misguided elected officials changed our government into a democracy aka socialism. It is humanism, based on man’s law and centralized government (tyranny) which will, in the end, lead to mobocracy. Is it any wonder bunkers have been built for protecting our elected officials for when the feathers hit the fan? And that day is surely coming.

In his book Perestroika, Gorbachev says that “according to Lenin, socialism and democracy are indivisible,” and the “essence of perestroika (restructuring) lies in the fact that it united socialism with democracy and revives the Leninist concept of socialist construction both in theory and in practice.” Thus, when he declares for “democracy,” he means “democracy” within the Leninist conception and definition of the term, something quite opposite of that which most Americans assume he is talking about…[2]

I will now go reread the book by Arno Froese, How Democracy Will Elect the Antichrist.

Footnotes:

1, Deliberate Dumbing Down By Charlotte Iserbyt

2, New American 10/30/1995 P.26

www.newswithviews.com/Betty/Freauf116.htm

Betty is a former Oregon Republican party activist having served as state party secretary, county chairman, 5th congressional vice chairman and then elected chairman, and a precinct worker for many years but Betty gave up on the two-party system in 2004 and joined the Constitutional Party.

Betty is a researcher specializing in education, a freelance journalist and a regular contributor to www.NewsWithViews.com

E-Mail: bettyboot@wvi.com