A thought-provoking new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today showing its members approving the 9 November meeting on Afghanistan to be held in Moscow and attended by representatives of the Taliban radical movement (outlawed in Russia)—that comes days after Supreme Allied Commander US Army General Austin Miller admitted that the United States has been defeated in this over 17-year war they started in 2002—notes that relations between Moscow and Washington in trying to resolve this conflict are being complicated by the situation in US where the elites and the society they govern are so polarized they have locked themselves in “cold civil war”—and whose deadlock won’t be broken until this coming week’s 2018 Midterm Elections where the “colour of the wave” (Blue, Red or No Wave) will be determined by who is the most afraid—that all members agree will be those supporting President Trump—but whose most puzzling aspect of is famous Hollywood actress Jane Fonda joining her nation’s leftists factions to proclaim that Trump is Adolf Hitler and America is now Nazi Germany—that caused President Putin to express the logical absurdity of this notion as the caravans of migrant refugees heading towards the US from Central America would be like Jewish peoples lining up by the hundreds-of-thousands and demanding Hitler allow them into Nazi Germany so he could exterminate them, and that no one of sane mind could ever believe was true.  [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

According to this report, with Hollywood actress Jane Fonda joining the growing leftist chorus calling President Trump a modern day Adolph Hitler, who was joined by communist US Senator Bernie Sanders claiming that Trump is the most racist president in American history—a comical claim to make as Trump doesn’t even come close to being as racist as past American presidents—one could rightfully awaken today believing that a time machine had transported them back to 2016 when these exact same claims being made about Trump by these leftists were being made, too.

So sure were these leftists in believing that they had successfully deployed their false Trump-Hitler-Racist meme in 2016, this report says, they grandly began proclaiming their election victory—such as when they declared that Hillary Clinton would beat Trump in the “Blue Wall” state of Wisconsin by 6 points (Trump won by 5), and, most famously, the prestigious Princeton Election Consortium projecting that Clinton had a 99% unstoppable chance of winning her election against Trump.

Most instructive, but widely ignored, about the abysmal Princeton Election Consortium prediction that Hillary Clinton couldn’t possibly lose the 2016 US presidential election, this report notes, was its aftermath analysis as to how they were so wrong—that was led by Princeton University election forecaster neuroscientist Dr. Sam Wang who admitted that as emotional as this race was, from a statistical standpoint, there were many trends that ended up being pretty stable—and in warning to anyone thinking that high statistical leads really meant anything at all stated: “When FiveThirtyEight was giving a probability of a Clinton win as 80 percent, people will say, “A-ha, 80 percent is a done deal!”  But actually, 80 percent is not a done deal at all; 80 percent is worse than the odds of surviving Russian roulette.  And most of us would not voluntarily play Russian roulette.”

More simply stated about what Dr. Wang discovered in his analyzing the polling debacle of the 2016 US presidential election, this report explains, is that hyperbolic and hysterical media pronouncements can in no way whatsoever substitute themselves for historical facts—such as the liberal leftist mainstream media proclaiming in 2016 that with America having reached the landmark of having 200 million registered voters, coupled with 37 million of them having early voted, was absolute proof that Hillary Clinton was heading for a landslide victory—but that crashed headlong into historical reality when this 2016 US presidential election saw the lowest voter turnout in 20 years.      

With historical realities, not over blown media pronouncements, therefore, being more predictive of US elections than polls, this report details, one of the first indicators of who will win the 2018 Midterm Elections can be seen in the last midterm elections in 2014 that saw the lowest election turnout in 70 years as only 36.4 percent of eligible voters bothered to vote—27 million of whom voted early. 

And, though the early voting in US elections hit a record in 2016, and early voting for the 2018 Midterm Elections now exceeds the 2014 totals in 27 States, this report continues, no correlation exists between early voting and predicting what the actual voter turnout will be—and if showing anything at all, actually points towards the US continuing its downward trend of those voting in elections as what occurred in the 2014 Midterm Elections and the 2016 US presidential election. 

Not being able to use early voting numbers as a predictor of who will win this upcoming 2018 Midterm Election, combined with the growing apathy of the American people to vote in even the most contentious elections, such as Trump-Clinton in 2016, this report further notes, one must than turn to analyzing the most polarizing figure in this election, President Trump—who isn’t even on the ballot and whose popularity poll number stands at either 51% or 41%, depending on which polling measurement you want to believe, if any.

Unmistakable to note about President Trump’s presence in this election, though, this report says, is that one of the reasons that he won the 2016 residential election was because of American voters who may not have been loud in their support, but they came out and they voted for him—those same voters (and more) who are still supportive and still silent with no one knowing how many of them there actually are—that has led many experts to suggest that this election will be a test to determine if Trump is leading a movement or a moment—and whose evidence for this being a movement is showing up in polls showing the Republican Party is now leading Democrats—and, just yesterday, tens-of-thousands of people coming to a cornfield in Missouri to stand in the rain and cold to hear Trump, while at the same time, former President Obama couldn’t even fill a high school gymnasium in Georgia that was warm and toasty.  

President Donald Trump meets tens-of-thousands of his rain soaked supporters in a Columbia-Missouri cornfield on 2 November 2018

To who comprises the movement that President Trump is leading towards another shock election victory, this report continues, are tens-of-millions of white blue-collar voters and their families abandoned by the leftist Democrats—who love Trump with such passion for saving them, warning alarms are now ringing among leftist Democrats that they’ll come out in force to blunt any so called “Blue Wave” they once believed they could ride to victory.

Joining these white blue-collar voters in supporting President Trump to the absolute shock and horror of leftist Democrats, this report notes, are growing numbers of Millennial voters—who are earning 20% less than Baby Boomers did at the same age, whose student debt has reached an all-time high, recent studies show have very little money saved for retirement and are urgently in need of policies that create more economic stability for more people—and, when more than 16,000 of them registered to vote between the ages of 18 and 34 responded to an online survey, showed that they are losing their enthusiasm for the Democratic Party, and a growing number of them now believing that Trump and the Republican Party are offering them better economic leadership—thus proving, once again, the old election saying “It’s the economy, stupid!” being as true today as it always has been.

And as if it isn’t enough of shock to these leftist Democrats in seeing white blue-collar workers and Millennial voters defecting to President Trump, this report says, one can only imagine the depths of despair they’ve now fallen into after discovering that over 20% of black American voters now support Trump, too—and without whom the Democrat Party will cease to exist as a national party as it cannot win any election without 90% of black voters supporting them.  

And as if this movement assembled and arrayed by President Trump against these Democrats couldn’t get any worse for these leftists, this report concludes, they now have to contend in this 2018 Midterm Election against “God’s Red Army”, too—that is a title given by the New York Times to Christian evangelicals in America that make up 26.3% of the population, voted 81% for Trump in 2016, and are the most reliable voters any country has ever seen—and who today are micro-targeting around 125 million social conservative voters across 19 different States through door-to-door interactions, digital ads, phone calls, and mailers, and will send out about 28 million digital ads encouraging them to vote in this last weekend and Monday—and that enter a volatile political environment that has already seen the Republicans and Democrats combined spending a staggering $1 billion, mostly going to pay for 3.5 million campaign ads, hardly any of which even mention Trump because of how much he’s loved—but for the Democrats is nothing but money going up in flames as President Putin correctly assessed that this election will be won by who is more fearful—that most certainly isn’t Americans fearing the childs fairy tale that Trump is Hitler, as they know it’s a lie—but is, instead, anyone supporting Trump, all of whom know, that if given the chance, these leftists will actually kill them—and who will crawl to the polls to vote if needed to keep that from happening.   

November 3, 2018 © EU and US all rights reserved.  Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]

[Note: The WhatDoesItMean.com website was created for and donated to the Sisters of Sorcha Faal in 2003 by a small group of American computer experts led by the late global technology guru Wayne Green (1922-2013) to counter the propaganda being used by the West to promote their illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq.]

[Note: The word Kremlin (fortress inside a city) as used in this report refers to Russian citadels, including in Moscow, having cathedrals wherein female Schema monks (Orthodox nuns) reside, many of whom are devoted to the mission of the Sisters of Sorcha Faal.]

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2701.htm