Custom Search
Clinton is popular where voting machines decide primaries, tends to lose big where delegates are chosen in face-to-face caucuses
Dick EAStman
March 29, 2016
Hillary Clinton is popular among voting-machine Democrats in primaries but is defeated by wide margins in states where delegates are chosen in caucuses with no voting machines is involved, but only flesh and blood Democrats. That is the biggest statistical finding from the results. The second most significant correlation is demographic. There is a division in outcomes between populist states with preference for the redistributionist and election-law-reform going for Sanders rather than the the banks-and-corporations-race-baiting-feminist Democrats who is favored in states with bigger Jewish presence such as Massachusetts, Arkansas (Rockefeller-owned) , Florida (organized-crime and Jew retirement Dems), Arizona (Jew retirement and organized crime), Nevada (organized-crime, casinos) with big "black-lives-matter" politics agitation. Clinton also does better in states where the dominant faction of the Party has adopted the very undemocratic "winner take all" rule. Clinton also does well with "Democrats of the machines" -- who get to vote because they are high in the machine, called Super Delegates. Here is my little table outcomes to date, isupporting these generalizations. Note that primary elections are conducted with voting machines , with paper trail.
Arkansas (Rockefeller state, South; primary)
Clinton* 66%; Sanders 58.9%
Colorado (Western state, caucus)
Sanders* 58.9%; Clinton 40.4%
Florida (organized crime, Jewish, south; primary)
Clinton* 64%; Sanders 33.3%
Georgia (Southern, blacks; primary)
Clinton* 71.3% Sanders 28.2%
Hawaii (Western state, caucus)
Sanders* 69.9% Clinton 30.0%
Idaho (Populist, Mormon, Western; caucus)
Sanders* 78% Clinton 21.2%
Kansas (Populist, Mid-west; caucus)
Sanders* 67.7% Clinton 32.3%
Louisiana (Rockefeller state, blacks, Southern; primary)
Clinton* 71% Sanders 23.2%
Maine (Eastern, caucus)
Sanders* 64.3% Clinton 35.5%
Massachusetts (Eastern, Jewish, white-backpack corruption; primary)
Clinton* 50.0% Sanders 48.7%
Michigan (mid-west, populist, black Detroit; primary)
Sanders* 49.8% Clinton 48.3%
Minnesota (Mid-west, populist)
Sanders* 61.6% Clinton 38.4%
Mississippi ( South, blacks; caucus)
Clinton* 82.6% Sanders 16.5%
Missouri (South, primary)
Clinton* 49.6% Sanders 49.4%
Nebraska (Mid-west, populist; caucus)
Sanders* 57.1% Clinton 47.3%
New Hampshire (Eastern, Wall Street bedroom; primaries)
Sanders* 60.4% Clinton 38.0%
North Carolina (Southern, blacks; primary)
Clinton* 54.6% Sanders 40.8%
Ohio (boundary east/midwest, organized crime; primary)
Clinton* 56.5% Sanders 42.7%
Oklahoma (southern/mid-west, populist; primary)
Sanders* 51.9% Clinton 41.5%
South Carolina (south, Jewish, black, organized crime; primary)
Clinton* 73.5% Sanders 26.0%
Tennessee (south, black; primary)
Clinto* 66.1% Sanders 32.4%
Texas (south, Jewish, organized crime, oil; primary)
Clinton* 64.2% Sanders 33.2%
Utah (western, Mormon, populist; primary)
Sanders* 86.1% Clinton 13.6%
Virginia (south, black, primary)
Clinton* 64% Sanders 35.2%
Washington (western; caucus)
Sanders* 72.7% Clinton 27.1%
Dick Eastman
Yakima, Washington
oldickeastman@q.com